National Portfolio Site Audits
Every facility upgrade to sustainability begins with an on-site facility audit. Whether upgrading a single facility or many facilities of similar design, this process is generally efficient because there are minimal site variations. Those who will engineer solutions using site audit data have little need, if any, to subcontract facility audits.
Auditing a national portfolio of different types of facilities is a completely different matter. Because the engineering party must subcontract audits with several parties who are less familiar with their standards and practices, this can often lead to challenges. Subcontracted auditors and the engineering party who hired them can fall into disputes when errors from unclear documentation. This results in finger pointing, project delays, and higher costs for customers. For these reasons, sustainable facility upgrades for businesses with national portfolios of different types can be an overwhelming process.
Through our national network of regional solution providers, businesses with national facility portfolios of different types can avoid these problems. By dividing national portfolios into geographic regions, the same upgrading process for a single facility can be employed. This eliminates the need to subcontract audits to parties unfamiliar with the standards and practices of the engineers who hire them. National portfolios can be upgraded by our regional network. The finger pointing, project delays, and higher costs associated with the old model can be a thing of the past.
Businesses with national portfolios of different facility types can rely on our unrivaled model to effectively execute their sustainability upgrades.